Comment on the GHZ variant of Bell's theorem without inequalities
Joy Christian

TL;DR
This paper identifies a sign error in the GHZ variant of Bell's theorem, which undermines its claim that EPR argument premises are incompatible in multi-particle entangled states.
Contribution
It corrects a critical mistake in the GHZ proof, challenging previous conclusions about nonlocality in multi-particle quantum systems.
Findings
The sign mistake invalidates the original GHZ argument.
The inconsistency claimed by GHZ is not supported after correction.
The result impacts interpretations of quantum nonlocality.
Abstract
I point out a sign mistake in the GHZ variant of Bell's theorem, invalidating its claim that the premisses of the EPR argument are inconsistent for systems of more than two particles in entangled quantum states.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
