AXPs/SGRs: strange stars with crusts?
Guojun Qiao, Lunhua Shang, Renxin Xu, Kejia Lee, Yongquan Xue, Qijun, Zhi, Jiguang Lu, Juntao Bai

TL;DR
This paper questions the magnetar model for AXPs/SGRs and proposes a crusted strange star model as a better explanation for their observational properties.
Contribution
It introduces a crusted strange star model as an alternative to the magnetar hypothesis for explaining AXPs/SGRs.
Findings
Magnetic field calculations assuming pure dipole radiation may be controversial.
X-ray luminosity exceeding rotational energy loss does not necessarily imply magnetic decay.
The crusted strange star model explains observational facts better than the magnetar model.
Abstract
The emission of Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs) and Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters (SGRs) is believed to be powered by the dissipation of their strong magnetic fields, which coined the name `magnetar'. By combining timing and energy observational results, the magnetar model can be easily appreciated. From a timing perspective, the magnetic field strengths of AXPs and SGRs, calculated assuming dipole radiation, are extremely strong. From an energy perspective, the X-ray/soft gamma-ray luminosities of AXPs and SGRs are larger than their rotational energy loss rates (i.e., ). It is thus reasonable to assume that the high-energy radiation comes from magnetic energy decay, and the magnetar model has been extensively discussed (or accepted). However, we argue that: (1) calculating magnetic fields by assuming that rotational energy loss is dominated by dipole radiation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astro and Planetary Science
