Predictive performance of power posteriors
Yann McLatchie, Edwin Fong, David T. Frazier, Jeremias Knoblauch

TL;DR
This paper investigates how tempering likelihoods affects posterior predictions, showing that in large samples, tempering does not influence predictive performance despite its impact in small samples.
Contribution
It provides a formal analysis demonstrating that tempering likelihoods does not affect posterior predictions in moderate-to-large samples.
Findings
Tempering impacts predictive performance in small samples.
In large samples, tempering does not affect posterior predictions.
Formal proof supporting the insensitivity of predictions to tempering in large samples.
Abstract
We analyse the impact of using tempered likelihoods in the production of posterior predictions. While the choice of temperature has an impact on predictive performance in small samples, we formally show that in moderate-to-large samples, tempering does not impact posterior predictions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Statistical Methods and Inference · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
