Computational Complexity of Standpoint LTL
St\'ephane Demri, Przemys{\l}aw Andrzej Wa{\l}\k{e}ga

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the computational complexity of Standpoint Linear Temporal Logic (SLTL), revealing its EXPSPACE-completeness and proposing a fragment with complexity comparable to LTL, thus advancing understanding of its computational properties.
Contribution
The paper establishes the EXPSPACE-completeness of SLTL satisfiability and introduces a fragment with complexity matching LTL, combining standpoint logic with linear-time temporal logic.
Findings
SLTL satisfiability is EXPSPACE-complete.
A fragment of SLTL has PSPACE-complete satisfiability, like LTL.
Combining standpoint logic with LTL does not increase worst-case complexity.
Abstract
Standpoint linear temporal logic SLTL is a recent formalism able to model possibly conflicting commitments made by distinct agents, taking into account aspects of temporal reasoning. In this paper, we analyse the computational properties of SLTL. First, we establish logarithmic-space reductions between the satisfiability problems for the multi-dimensional modal logic PTLxS5 and SLTL. This leads to the EXPSPACE-completeness of the satisfiability problem in SLTL, which is a surprising result in view of previous investigations. Next, we present a method of restricting SLTL so that the obtained fragment is a strict extension of both the (non-temporal) standpoint logic and linear-time temporal logic LTL, but the satisfiability problem is PSPACE-complete in this fragment. Thus, we show how to combine standpoint logic with LTL so that the worst-case complexity of the obtained combination is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
