A technical note on finite best-worst random utility model representations
Hans Colonius

TL;DR
This paper explores the mathematical foundations of best-worst choice models, providing new insights into their utility representations and extending previous characterizations for sets of four or more options.
Contribution
It constructs a probability measure on rankings that implies a random utility representation, advancing the theoretical understanding of best-worst choice models.
Findings
Complete characterization of the best-worst-choice polytope for four alternatives.
Block-Marschak inequalities are insufficient for sets of four or more alternatives.
Construction of a probability measure on rankings for random utility representation.
Abstract
This paper investigates the random utility representation of best-worst choice probabilities (picking the best and the worst alternative from an offered set). Doignon (2023) presented a complete characterization of the best-worst-choice polytope on four alternatives. Moreover, using polytope methods he showed that the Block-Marschak inequalities for best-worst choices are not sufficient for a random utility representation of best-worst choices for sets of four or more alternatives. Following the approach of Falmagne (1978), we construct a probability measure on the set of rankings for a set of four alternatives implying a random utility representation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Portfolio Optimization
