The impact of cosmic variance on PTAs anisotropy searches
Thomas Konstandin, Anna-Malin Lemke, Andrea Mitridate, Enrico Perboni

TL;DR
Cosmic variance significantly affects PTA anisotropy searches by causing false detections of anisotropy and complicating sky map reconstructions, thus requiring refined analysis methods.
Contribution
This work quantitatively analyzes how cosmic variance impacts PTA-based GWB anisotropy detection and sky map reconstruction, highlighting the need for improved search techniques.
Findings
Cosmic variance can cause ~50% false anisotropy detection rate.
Fluctuations hinder accurate GWB sky map reconstruction.
Cosmic variance complicates identifying bright GW hotspots.
Abstract
Several Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) collaborations have recently found evidence for a Gravitational Wave Background (GWB) by measuring the perturbations that this background induces in the time-of-arrivals of pulsar signals. These perturbations are expected to be correlated across different pulsars and, for isotropic GWBs, the expected values of these correlations (obtained by averaging over different GWB realizations) are a simple function of the pulsars' angular separations, known as the Hellings-Downs (HD) correlation function. On the other hand, anisotropic GWBs would induce deviations from these HD correlations in a way that can be used to search for anisotropic distributions of the GWB power. However, even for isotropic GWBs, interference between GW sources radiating at overlapping frequencies induces deviations from the HD correlation pattern, an effect known in the literature as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
