Adjusting Model Size in Continual Gaussian Processes: How Big is Big Enough?
Guiomar Pescador-Barrios, Sarah Filippi, Mark van der Wilk

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for automatically adjusting the size of Gaussian process models in continual learning, ensuring near-optimal performance without extensive hyperparameter tuning across diverse datasets.
Contribution
We propose a novel approach to dynamically determine model size in continual Gaussian processes, reducing the need for dataset-specific hyperparameter tuning.
Findings
Method maintains high performance across datasets
Requires less hyperparameter tuning than existing approaches
Automatically adapts model size during training
Abstract
Many machine learning models require setting a parameter that controls their size before training, e.g. number of neurons in DNNs, or inducing points in GPs. Increasing capacity typically improves performance until all the information from the dataset is captured. After this point, computational cost keeps increasing, without improved performance. This leads to the question "How big is big enough?" We investigate this problem for Gaussian processes (single-layer neural networks) in continual learning. Here, data becomes available incrementally, and the final dataset size will therefore not be known before training, preventing the use of heuristics for setting a fixed model size. We develop a method to automatically adjust model size while maintaining near-optimal performance. Our experimental procedure follows the constraint that any hyperparameters must be set without seeing dataset…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
