Theoretical and Practical Progress in Hyperspectral Pixel Unmixing with Large Spectral Libraries from a Sparse Perspective

TL;DR

This paper evaluates various regression methods for hyperspectral pixel unmixing with large spectral libraries, emphasizing their ability to correctly identify materials and their abundances, and highlights the superiority of Bayesian methods aligned with hyperspectral data characteristics.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive performance comparison of multiple regression techniques, including Bayesian approaches, for hyperspectral unmixing with large spectral libraries.

Findings

Bayesian methods with phenomenology-based priors outperform others.

Regularization improves material detection accuracy.

Step-wise regression shows moderate effectiveness.

Abstract

Hyperspectral unmixing is the process of determining the presence of individual materials and their respective abundances from an observed pixel spectrum. Unmixing is a fundamental process in hyperspectral image analysis, and is growing in importance as increasingly large spectral libraries are created and used. Unmixing is typically done with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression. However, unmixing with large spectral libraries where the materials present in a pixel are not a priori known, solving for the coefficients in OLS requires inverting a non-invertible matrix from a large spectral library. A number of regression methods are available that can produce a numerical solution using regularization, but with considerably varied effectiveness. Also, simple methods that are unpopular in the statistics literature (i.e. step-wise regression) are used with some level of effectiveness in hyperspectral analysis. In this paper, we provide a thorough performance evaluation of the methods considered, evaluating methods based on how often they select the correct materials in the models. Investigated methods include ordinary least squares regression, non-negative least squares regression, ridge regression, lasso regression, step-wise regression and Bayesian model averaging. We evaluated these unmixing approaches using multiple criteria: incorporation of non-negative abundances, model size, accurate mineral detection and root mean squared error (RMSE). We provide a taxonomy of the regression methods, showing that most methods can be understood as Bayesian methods with specific priors. We conclude that methods that can be derived with priors that correspond to the phenomenology of hyperspectral imagery outperform those with priors that are optimal for prediction performance under the assumptions of ordinary least squares linear regression.