Analysis of sensors for movement analysis
Marcos Faundez-Zanuy, Anna Faura-Pujol, Hector Montalvo-Ruiz, Alexia, Losada-Fors, Pablo Genovese, Pilar Sanz-Cartagena

TL;DR
This paper compares various movement sensors to evaluate their accuracy for applications like tremor analysis and touchless device control, highlighting their relevance in health monitoring and pandemic-related scenarios.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of different sensors for movement detection, including custom sensors for tapping and foot motion, emphasizing their potential in health and touchless control applications.
Findings
Leap Motion shows high accuracy in hand movement detection
Custom sensors effectively analyze tapping and foot motion
Sensors enable touchless device activation reducing contamination risk
Abstract
In this paper we analyze and compare different movement sensors: micro-chip gesture-ID, leap motion, noitom mocap, and specially developed sensor for tapping and foot motion analysis. The main goal is to evaluate the accu-racy of measurements provided by the sensors. This study presents rele-vance, for instance, in tremor/Parkinson disease analysis as well as no touch mechanisms for activation and control of devices. This scenario is especially interesting in COVID-19 scenario. Removing the need to touch a surface, the risk of contagion is reduced.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
