Persistence kernels for classification: A comparative study
Cinzia Bandiziol, Stefano De Marchi

TL;DR
This paper compares five different persistence kernels in the context of classification problems, evaluating their performance across various datasets and providing Python code for reproducibility.
Contribution
It introduces and compares five persistence kernels for classification, offering insights into their relative effectiveness and reproducibility through code.
Findings
Different persistence kernels show varying classification performance
The study provides a reproducible framework with Python code
Comparison across multiple datasets highlights kernel strengths and weaknesses
Abstract
The aim of the present work is a comparative study of different persistence kernels applied to various classification problems. After some necessary preliminaries on homology and persistence diagrams, we introduce five different kernels that are then used to compare their performances of classification on various datasets. We also provide the Python codes for the reproducibility of results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
