Categorical Framework for Typed Extensional and Intensional Models in Formal Semantics
Daniel Quigley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a category-theoretic framework for modeling intensional and extensional semantics, unifying their representations and clarifying their relationship in formal semantics.
Contribution
It constructs the category ModInt to represent intensional models and shows their equivalence to extensional models, providing a modular, order-independent approach.
Findings
Unified categorical representation of intensionality and extensionality
Equivalence of trivial intensional models to extensional models
Framework applicable to natural language semantics
Abstract
Intensional computation derives concrete outputs from abstract function definitions; extensional computation defines functions through explicit input-output pairs. In formal semantics: intensional computation interprets expressions as context-dependent functions; extensional computation evaluates expressions based on their denotations in an otherwise fixed context. This paper reformulates typed extensional and intensional models of formal semantics within a category-theoretic framework and demonstrates their natural representation therein. We construct , the category of intensional models, building on the categories of sets, of relations, and and of Kripke frames with monotone maps and bounded morphisms, respectively. We prove that trivial intensional models are equivalent to extensional models,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
