On the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations
Shashank Shalgar

TL;DR
This paper clarifies that the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations is not directly related to the self-interaction potential, debunking a common misconception and correcting assumptions about numerical simulation resolution requirements.
Contribution
It challenges the myth that the oscillation length scale depends on the self-interaction potential, providing a clearer understanding of the physical and numerical aspects of neutrino oscillations.
Findings
The oscillation length scale is not determined by the inverse of the self-interaction potential.
Numerical convergence does not require spatial resolution equal to the inverse of the potential.
Debunks a widespread misconception in the neutrino physics community.
Abstract
In this paper, I present a discussion on the length scale of collective neutrino oscillations. There is a popular myth in the field that the length scale of collective neutrino oscillation is related to the strength of self-interaction potential; this is a result of confusion between the length scale and time scale. As a consequence of this myth, it is believed that the convergence of numerical simulation of quantum kinetic equations requires a spatial resolution (radial bin size) that is equal to the inverse of the self-interaction potential. I try to debunk this myth in this paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
