Peaking into the Black-box: Prediction Intervals Give Insight into Data-driven Quadrotor Model Reliability
Jasper van Beers, Coen de Visser

TL;DR
This paper evaluates prediction intervals for data-driven quadrotor models, demonstrating their ability to quantify uncertainty and reliability, especially during extrapolation, using polynomial and neural network models validated on simulations and real flight data.
Contribution
It introduces and validates prediction interval estimation techniques for quadrotor models, highlighting their effectiveness in assessing model reliability under uncertainty.
Findings
ANN prediction intervals widen during extrapolation
Polynomial PIs are less sensitive to extrapolation
PIs provide probabilistic bounds for model outputs
Abstract
Ensuring the reliability and validity of data-driven quadrotor model predictions is essential for their accepted and practical use. This is especially true for grey- and black-box models wherein the mapping of inputs to predictions is not transparent and subsequent reliability notoriously difficult to ascertain. Nonetheless, such techniques are frequently and successfully used to identify quadrotor models. Prediction intervals (PIs) may be employed to provide insight into the consistency and accuracy of model predictions. This paper estimates such PIs for polynomial and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) quadrotor aerodynamic models. Two existing ANN PI estimation techniques - the bootstrap method and the quality driven method - are validated numerically for quadrotor aerodynamic models using an existing high-fidelity quadrotor simulation. Quadrotor aerodynamic models are then identified…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
