Deep Learning in Medical Image Registration: Magic or Mirage?
Rohit Jena, Deeksha Sethi, Pratik Chaudhari, James C. Gee

TL;DR
This paper compares classical and learning-based deformable image registration methods, revealing their strengths, limitations, and conditions for optimal performance, and proposes guidelines for selecting the appropriate approach.
Contribution
It explicitly links mutual information to registration performance, validates this with state-of-the-art methods, and offers a practical recipe for choosing registration paradigms.
Findings
Learning-based methods can achieve high-fidelity registration.
Classical methods are more robust to domain shifts.
Performance correlates strongly with mutual information.
Abstract
Classical optimization and learning-based methods are the two reigning paradigms in deformable image registration. While optimization-based methods boast generalizability across modalities and robust performance, learning-based methods promise peak performance, incorporating weak supervision and amortized optimization. However, the exact conditions for either paradigm to perform well over the other are shrouded and not explicitly outlined in the existing literature. In this paper, we make an explicit correspondence between the mutual information of the distribution of per-pixel intensity and labels, and the performance of classical registration methods. This strong correlation hints to the fact that architectural designs in learning-based methods is unlikely to affect this correlation, and therefore, the performance of learning-based methods. This hypothesis is thoroughly validated with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Medical Imaging and Analysis
