Explainable AI Reloaded: Challenging the XAI Status Quo in the Era of Large Language Models
Upol Ehsan, Mark O. Riedl

TL;DR
This paper critiques traditional XAI approaches in the era of Large Language Models, advocating for a human-centered perspective that emphasizes explainability beyond just opening the black-box.
Contribution
It challenges the assumption that opening the black-box is the primary goal of XAI, proposing a shift towards human-centered explainability strategies in LLM contexts.
Findings
Highlights epistemic blind spots of algorithm-centered XAI
Synthesizes XAI research along three dimensions
Proposes a human-centered approach to explainability
Abstract
When the initial vision of Explainable (XAI) was articulated, the most popular framing was to open the (proverbial) "black-box" of AI so that we could understand the inner workings. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), the very ability to open the black-box is increasingly limited especially when it comes to non-AI expert end-users. In this paper, we challenge the assumption of "opening" the black-box in the LLM era and argue for a shift in our XAI expectations. Highlighting the epistemic blind spots of an algorithm-centered XAI view, we argue that a human-centered perspective can be a path forward. We operationalize the argument by synthesizing XAI research along three dimensions: explainability outside the black-box, explainability around the edges of the black box, and explainability that leverages infrastructural seams. We conclude with takeaways that reflexively inform…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
