Gapped Phases in (2+1)d with Non-Invertible Symmetries: Part I
Lakshya Bhardwaj, Daniel Pajer, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, Apoorv Tiwari, Alison Warman, Jingxiang Wu

TL;DR
This paper classifies gapped phases in (2+1)d with non-invertible symmetries using SymTFTs, revealing an infinite variety of boundary conditions and phases, especially for finite abelian groups, through novel theta constructions.
Contribution
It introduces non-minimal boundary conditions via theta constructions, expanding the classification of gapped phases and non-invertible symmetries in (2+1)d theories.
Findings
Infinite non-invertible symmetries from non-minimal BCs
Rich structure of gapped phases for finite abelian groups
Explicit examples for G=Z2 and other finite abelian groups
Abstract
We use the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) to study and classify gapped phases in (2+1)d for a class of categorical symmetries, referred to as being of bosonic type. The SymTFTs for these symmetries are given by twisted and untwisted (3+1)d Dijkgraaf-Witten (DW) theories for finite groups G. A finite set of boundary conditions (BCs) of these DW theories is well-known: these simply involve imposing Dirichlet and Neumann conditions on the (3+1)d gauge fields. We refer to these as minimal BCs. The key new observation here is that for each DW theory, there exists an infinite number of other BCs, that we call non-minimal BCs. These non-minimal BCs are all obtained by a 'theta construction', which involves stacking the Dirichlet BC with 3d TFTs having G 0-form symmetry, and gauging the diagonal G symmetry. On the one hand, using the non-minimal BCs as symmetry BCs gives rise to an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
