Restricted Spatial Regression is Reasonable Statistical Practice: Clarifications, Interpretations, and New Developments
Jonathan R. Bradley

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the theoretical foundations of Restricted Spatial Regression (RSR), demonstrating its equivalence to spatial linear mixed models under certain conditions, and introduces new computational and interpretative benefits for spatial data analysis.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between RSR and SLMM in Bayesian analysis, explores benefits in handling confounding, and introduces efficient sampling methods and transfer learning interpretations.
Findings
RSR's marginal posterior is equivalent to SLMM's under certain priors.
RSR offers computational advantages with direct posterior sampling.
Transfer learning improves inference on dependent regression coefficients.
Abstract
The spatial linear mixed model (SLMM) consists of fixed and spatial random effects that may be linearly dependent. Partially motivated as a means to address potential issues with confounding, the Restricted spatial regression (RSR) model restricts spatial random effects to be in the orthogonal column space of the covariates. Recent articles have shown that the misspecified Bayesian RSR generally performs worse than the SLMM when the data is generated from the SLMM. However, we show that the misspecified Bayesian RSR model's marginal posterior distribution is equivalent up to a reparameterization to that of the SLMM's marginal posterior distribution, under a certain prior assumption on the orthogonalized regression coefficients. This suggests that the RSR models are not sub-optimal as the subsequent Bayesian analysis can be interpreted as a type of SLMM Bayesian analysis. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
