On the use of neurosymbolic AI for defending against cyber attacks
Gudmund Grov, Jonas Halvorsen, Magnus Wiik Eckhoff, Bj{\o}rn Jervell, Hansen, Martin Eian, Vasileios Mavroeidis

TL;DR
This paper advocates for combining connectionist and symbolic AI into neurosymbolic AI to improve cyber attack detection and response, highlighting challenges, proposing use cases, and demonstrating feasibility with proof-of-concept experiments.
Contribution
It introduces neurosymbolic AI as a promising approach for cybersecurity, outlining key challenges, potential use cases, and providing initial experimental validation.
Findings
Feasibility of neurosymbolic AI in cybersecurity demonstrated
Identified key challenges in applying AI to cyber defense
Proposed promising research directions for neurosymbolic AI in security
Abstract
It is generally accepted that all cyber attacks cannot be prevented, creating a need for the ability to detect and respond to cyber attacks. Both connectionist and symbolic AI are currently being used to support such detection and response. In this paper, we make the case for combining them using neurosymbolic AI. We identify a set of challenges when using AI today and propose a set of neurosymbolic use cases we believe are both interesting research directions for the neurosymbolic AI community and can have an impact on the cyber security field. We demonstrate feasibility through two proof-of-concept experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques · Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
