Why artificial disruption is not a concern for current cosmological simulations
Feihong He, Jiaxin Han, Zhaozhou Li

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that current cosmological simulations reliably resolve subhalo populations, showing that most disruptions are due to physical processes, not numerical artifacts, especially for recent accretions.
Contribution
It provides evidence that artificial disruption is negligible in modern simulations and clarifies the physical origins of subhalo disruption, especially for high-redshift sub-subhalos.
Findings
First-order subhalos after redshift 2 survive to present
Most disrupted subhalos are high-redshift sub-subhalos
High mass loss rates are confirmed as physical phenomena
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that cold dark matter subhalos are hard to disrupt and almost all cases of subhalo disruption observed in numerical simulations are due to numerical effects. However, these findings primarily relied on idealized numerical experiments, which do not fully capture the realistic conditions of subhalo evolution within a hierarchical cosmological context. Based on the Aquarius simulations, we identify clear segregation in the population of surviving and disrupted subhalos, which corresponds to two distinct acquisition channels of subhalos. We find that all of the first-order subhalos accreted after redshift 2 survive to the present time without suffering from artificial disruption. On the other hand, most of the disrupted subhalos are sub-subhalos accreted at high redshift. Unlike the first-order subhalos, sub-subhalos experience pre-processing and many of them are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Data Storage Technologies · Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
