Left of Fab: Securing Design and Collaboration in the Semiconductor Value Chain
John C. Hoag

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the security challenges in semiconductor design workflows, comparing them to PCB processes, and proposes a framework to secure these workflows amid increasing industry and geopolitical pressures.
Contribution
It introduces a vendor- and tool-agnostic framework for understanding and securing integrated circuit design workflows, addressing a significant knowledge gap.
Findings
Comparison of IC and PCB design workflows
Classification of security threats in semiconductor design
Framework for securing design workflows
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in the general understanding -- and academic scrutiny -- of current and emerging workflows for designing and fabricating integrated circuits. The approach is to compare the IC design workflow with that for printed circuit boards, then to discern a classification for threats. The need to define and secure workflows is amplified by both U.S. investment in the semiconductor manufacturing and market forces affecting GPU production for AI applications. The origin of this knowledge gap can be the proprietary nature of solution spaces, but it can be the lack of demand for teaching and learning for engineers and technicians in this domain. This paper presents a framework for understanding the security of design workflows in a vendor- and tool-agnostic way.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
