Centralization in Attester-Proposer Separation
Mallesh Pai, Max Resnick

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that execution tickets and auctions can lead to increased centralization in block proposal markets, favoring the strongest bidders and creating a significant centralizing force even without multi-block MEV strategies.
Contribution
It provides a new model analyzing the interaction between ahead-of-time and just-in-time auctions, revealing how they inherently favor dominant bidders and promote centralization.
Findings
Execution auctions advantage the strongest bidders in JIT auctions.
Strong bidders tend to win execution auctions consistently.
Resale market imperfections reinforce centralization effects.
Abstract
We show that Execution Tickets and Execution Auctions dramatically increase centralization in the market for block proposals, even without multi-block MEV concerns. Previous analyses have insufficiently or incorrectly modeled the interaction between ahead-of-time auctions and just-in-time (JIT) auctions. We study a model where bidders compete in an execution auction ahead of time, and then the winner holds a JIT auction to resell the proposal rights when the slot arrives. During the execution auction, bidders only know the distribution of their valuations. Bidders then draw values from their distributions and compete in the JIT auction. We show that a bidder who wins the execution auction is substantially advantaged in the JIT auction since they can set a reserve price higher than their own realized value for the slot to increase their revenue. As a result, there is a strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMineral Processing and Grinding · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
