Elevating Software Trust: Unveiling and Quantifying the Risk Landscape
Sarah Ali Siddiqui, Chandra Thapa, Rayne Holland, Wei Shao, and Seyit, Camtepe

TL;DR
This paper introduces SAFER, a dynamic, data-driven risk assessment framework for software security that incorporates trust and human factors, improving adaptability and accuracy over static models.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel risk assessment framework that dynamically assigns data-driven weights and integrates trust and human aspects for better security risk quantification.
Findings
SAFER reduces subjectivity in risk scoring.
It outperforms static models in adaptability.
Demonstrated on 9000 samples with comparative analysis.
Abstract
Considering the ever-evolving threat landscape and rapid changes in software development, we propose a risk assessment framework called SAFER (Software Analysis Framework for Evaluating Risk). This framework is based on the necessity of a dynamic, data-driven, and adaptable process to quantify security risk in the software supply chain. Usually, when formulating such frameworks, static pre-defined weights are assigned to reflect the impact of each contributing parameter while aggregating these individual parameters to compute resulting security risk scores. This leads to inflexibility, a lack of adaptability, and reduced accuracy, making them unsuitable for the changing nature of the digital world. We adopt a novel perspective by examining security risk through the lens of trust and incorporating the human aspect. Moreover, we quantify security risk associated with individual software…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInformation and Cyber Security
