Earthquake magnitudes depend on seismic history, as revealed by a neural network analysis
Neri Berman, Oleg Zlydenko, Oren Gilon, Yossi Matias, Yohai Bar-Sinai

TL;DR
This paper introduces MAGNET, a neural network model that leverages seismic history to predict earthquake magnitudes more accurately than traditional models, revealing that magnitudes are not independent of seismic history.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that earthquake magnitudes can be predicted from seismic history using a neural network, challenging the assumption of magnitude independence in forecasting models.
Findings
MAGNET achieves an average information gain of 0.07 bits per earthquake.
The model outperforms Gutenberg-Richter-based models in multiple catalogs.
Seismic history contains extractable information about future earthquake magnitudes.
Abstract
Earthquake occurrence is notoriously difficult to predict. While some aspects of their spatiotemporal statistics can be relatively well captured by point-process models, very little is known regarding the magnitude of future events, and it is deeply debated whether it is possible to predict the magnitude of an earthquake before it starts. Most operational forecasting models assume that earthquake magnitudes follow a time-independent Gutenberg-Richter (GR) distribution, effectively treating magnitudes as independent of seismic history. We address this fundamental question by demonstrating that standard hypocenter catalogs carry information about future earthquake magnitudes, making them more predictable than previously considered. We present MAGNET (MAGnitude Neural EsTimation model), which uses a multi-encoder neural network architecture with LSTM units to process spatiotemporal…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
