A Decision-driven Methodology for Designing Uncertainty-aware AI Self-Assessment
Gregory Canal, Vladimir Leung, Philip Sage, Eric Heim, I-Jeng Wang

TL;DR
This paper presents a decision-driven methodology for designing uncertainty-aware AI self-assessment tools, aiming to improve trustworthiness and decision-making in high-impact scenarios by categorizing methods and providing practical guidelines.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive, practical framework for selecting and designing AI self-assessment methods considering decision impact and real-world application needs.
Findings
Categorized AI self-assessment methods along key dimensions.
Provided guidelines for method selection based on decision impact.
Demonstrated utility through two national-interest scenarios.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making processes and systems throughout society and, in particular, has emerged as a significant technology in high-impact scenarios of national interest. Yet, despite AI's impressive predictive capabilities in controlled settings, it still suffers from a range of practical setbacks preventing its widespread use in various critical scenarios. In particular, it is generally unclear if a given AI system's predictions can be trusted by decision-makers in downstream applications. To address the need for more transparent, robust, and trustworthy AI systems, a suite of tools has been developed to quantify the uncertainty of AI predictions and, more generally, enable AI to "self-assess" the reliability of its predictions. In this manuscript, we categorize methods for AI self-assessment along several key dimensions and provide guidelines…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRisk and Safety Analysis
MethodsFocus
