Calibrating the Absolute Magnitude of Type Ia Supernovae in Nearby Galaxies using [OII] and Implications for $H_{0}$
M. Dixon, J. Mould, C. Lidman, E. N. Taylor, C. Flynn, A. R. Duffy, L., Galbany, D. Scolnic, T. M. Davis, A. M\"oller, L. Kelsey, J. Lee, P. Wiseman,, M. Vincenzi, P. Shah, M. Aguena, S. S. Allam, O. Alves, D. Bacon, S. Bocquet,, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell

TL;DR
This study investigates how host galaxy properties, specifically [OII] emission line strength, can improve the standardization of Type Ia supernovae luminosities to refine measurements of the Hubble constant, but finds limited impact on resolving existing tensions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel correction based on [OII] equivalent width to standardize SN Ia luminosities and assesses its effect on H0 measurements using DES data.
Findings
[OII] EW correlates with Hubble residuals, offering an alternative to mass step correction.
Applying [OII] EW correction slightly adjusts H0 values but does not resolve the tension.
Host galaxy properties have limited influence on reducing the H0 discrepancy.
Abstract
The present state of cosmology is facing a crisis where there is a fundamental disagreement in measurements of the Hubble constant (), with significant tension between the early and late universe methods. Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are important to measuring through the astronomical distance ladder. However, there remains potential to better standardise SN Ia light curves by using known dependencies on host galaxy properties after the standard light curve width and colour corrections have been applied to the peak SN Ia luminosities. To explore this, we use the 5-year photometrically identified SNe Ia sample obtained by the Dark Energy Survey, along with host galaxy spectra obtained by the Australian Dark Energy Survey. Using host galaxy spectroscopy, we find a significant trend with the equivalent width (EW) of the [OII] 3727, 29 doublet, a proxy for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
