Topological Phases of Many-Body Localized Systems: Beyond Eigenstate Order

TL;DR

This paper develops a framework using quantum cellular automata to classify and understand anomalous localized topological phases in many-body localized systems, including driven and symmetry-enriched variants.

Contribution

It introduces a QCA-based classification scheme for ALT phases, extending to driven and symmetry-enriched cases, and clarifies misconceptions about Hamiltonian and ground state triviality.

Findings

Classified static and driven ALT phases in low dimensions.

Extended the topology study of QCA to include symmetry-enriched phases.

Provided models suitable for quantum simulation.

Abstract

Many-body localization (MBL) lends remarkable robustness to nonequilibrium phases of matter. Such phases can show topological and symmetry breaking order in their ground and excited states, but they may also belong to an anomalous localized topological phase (ALT phase). All eigenstates in an ALT phase are trivial, in that they can be deformed to product states, but the entire Hamiltonian cannot be deformed to a trivial localized model without going through a delocalization transition. Using a correspondence between MBL phases with short-ranged entanglement and locality preserving unitaries - called quantum cellular automata (QCA) - we reduce the classification of ALT phases to that of QCA. This method extends to periodically (Floquet) and quasiperiodically driven ALT phases, and captures anomalous Floquet phases within the same framework as static phases. We considerably develop the study of the topology of QCA, allowing us to classify static and driven ALT phases in low dimensions. The QCA framework further generalizes to include symmetry-enriched ALT phases (SALT phases) - which we also classify in low dimensions - and provides a large class of soluble models suitable for realization in quantum simulators. In systematizing the study of ALT phases, we both greatly extend the classification of interacting nonequilibrium systems and clarify a confusion in the literature which implicitly equates nontrivial Hamiltonians with nontrivial ground states.