Loop percolation versus link percolation in the random loop model
Volker Betz, Andreas Klippel, Mino Nicola Kraft

TL;DR
This paper quantitatively compares loop and link percolation transitions in the random loop model, showing they cannot coincide and providing bounds on their separation, with implications for weighted models.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of the separation between loop and percolation phase transitions in the random loop model, extending results to weighted models.
Findings
Loop and percolation phase transitions are separated by a minimal gap.
The results apply to both unweighted and weighted loop models.
A quantitative bound on the gap between the two transitions.
Abstract
In [Muhl2019], Peter M\"uhlbacher showed that in the random loop model without loop weights, a loop phase transition (assuming it exists) cannot occur at the same parameter as the percolation phase transition of the occupied edges. In this work, we give a quantitative version of this result, specifying a minimal gap between the percolation phase transition and a possible loop phase transition. A substantial part of our argument also works for weighted loop models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanics · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
