TL;DR
This study analyzes how controversy and toxicity on YouTube influence engagement and monetisation, revealing that toxicity increases engagement but can harm monetisation, with diverse strategies observed among creators.
Contribution
Introduces a curated YouTube controversy dataset, monetisation categorisation methods, and a machine learning toxicity model to explore their interplay.
Findings
Toxic comments correlate with higher engagement
High toxicity can negatively impact monetisation
Creators employ diverse monetisation strategies despite toxicity levels
Abstract
YouTube is a major social media platform that plays a significant role in digital culture, with content creators at its core. These creators often engage in controversial behaviour to drive engagement, which can foster toxicity. This paper presents a quantitative analysis of controversial content on YouTube, focusing on the relationship between controversy, toxicity, and monetisation. We introduce a curated dataset comprising 20 controversial YouTube channels extracted from Reddit discussions, including 16,349 videos and more than 105 million comments. We identify and categorise monetisation cues from video descriptions into various models, including affiliate marketing and direct selling, using lists of URLs and keywords. Additionally, we train a machine learning model to measure the toxicity of comments in these videos. Our findings reveal that while toxic comments correlate with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
