TL;DR
This paper explores the use of Hilbert space-filling curves for efficient sampling and ordering in landscape analysis, demonstrating they are faster and equally effective compared to traditional methods like nearest neighbour and Latin hypercube sampling.
Contribution
It introduces Hilbert curves as a computationally efficient alternative for sampling and ordering in landscape analysis, improving speed without losing feature quality.
Findings
Hilbert curves provide uniform coverage and spatial correlation in samples.
They extract salient landscape features faster than traditional methods.
Hilbert-based ordering is more efficient than nearest neighbour ordering.
Abstract
Landscape analysis aims to characterise optimisation problems based on their objective (or fitness) function landscape properties. The problem search space is typically sampled, and various landscape features are estimated based on the samples. One particularly salient set of features is information content, which requires the samples to be sequences of neighbouring solutions, such that the local relationships between consecutive sample points are preserved. Generating such spatially correlated samples that also provide good search space coverage is challenging. It is therefore common to first obtain an unordered sample with good search space coverage, and then apply an ordering algorithm such as the nearest neighbour to minimise the distance between consecutive points in the sample. However, the nearest neighbour algorithm becomes computationally prohibitive in higher dimensions, thus…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
