Evolution of H$\alpha$ Equivalent Widths from $z \sim 0.4-2.2$: implications for star formation and legacy surveys with Roman and Euclid
Ali Ahmad Khostovan, Sangeeta Malhotra, James E. Rhoads, David Sobral,, Santosh Harish, Vithal Tilvi, Alicia Coughlin, Saeed Rezaee

TL;DR
This study models the evolution of H-alpha equivalent widths across redshifts 0.4 to 2.2, revealing their significant role in cosmic star formation and forecasting future survey capabilities with Roman and Euclid.
Contribution
It introduces a redshift-dependent anti-correlation model for H-alpha EW and stellar mass, validated against observations, and forecasts the number of detectable high-EW emitters in upcoming surveys.
Findings
H-alpha EW increases with redshift, especially in low-mass galaxies.
High EW emitters contribute substantially to cosmic star formation at z~1.5-2.
Forecasts predict tens of thousands of H-alpha emitters for Roman and Euclid surveys.
Abstract
We investigate the `intrinsic' H EW distributions of narrowband-selected H samples from HiZELS and DAWN using a forward modeling approach. We find an EW - stellar mass anti-correlation with steepening slopes to at and , respectively. Typical EW increases as for a M emitter from \r{A} () to \r{A} () and is steeper with decreasing stellar mass highlighting the high EW nature of low-mass high- systems. We model this redshift evolving anti-correlation, , and find it produces H luminosity and SFR functions strongly consistent with observations validating the model and allowing us to use to investigate the relative contribution of H emitters…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
