Exploring atmospheric neutrino oscillations at ESSnuSB
ESSnuSB: J. Aguilar, M. Anastasopoulos, E. Baussan, A.K., Bhattacharyya, A. Bignami, M. Blennow, M. Bogomilov, B. Bolling, E., Bouquerel, F. Bramati, A. Branca, G. Brunetti, I. Bustinduy, C.J. Carlile, J., Cederkall, T.W. Choi, S. Choubey, P. Christiansen, M. Collins

TL;DR
This paper analyzes atmospheric neutrino oscillations at the ESSnuSB facility, demonstrating the potential to determine neutrino mass ordering and $ heta_{23}$ octant with high confidence over a decade of data collection.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed sensitivity analysis of atmospheric neutrino oscillations at ESSnuSB, highlighting its capability to resolve mass ordering and $ heta_{23}$ octant.
Findings
Mass ordering can be resolved at 3σ after 4 years and 5σ after 10 years.
Wrong $ heta_{23}$ octant can be excluded at 3σ after 4 years for normal ordering.
Results are complementary to the accelerator neutrino program.
Abstract
This study provides an analysis of atmospheric neutrino oscillations at the ESSnuSB far detector facility. The prospects of the two cylindrical Water Cherenkov detectors with a total fiducial mass of 540 kt are investigated over 10 years of data taking in the standard three-flavor oscillation scenario. We present the confidence intervals for the determination of mass ordering, octant as well as for the precisions on and . It is shown that mass ordering can be resolved by CL ( CL) after 4 years (10 years) regardless of the true neutrino mass ordering. Correspondingly, the wrong octant could be excluded by CL after 4 years (8 years) in the case where the true neutrino mass ordering is normal ordering (inverted ordering). The results presented in this work are complementary to the accelerator…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
