Perfect quantum strategies with small input cardinality

TL;DR

This paper develops minimal-input perfect quantum strategies for nonlocal games across many dimensions by extending Kochen-Specker sets, providing new constructions, and analyzing their Bell inequalities, challenging previous conjectures.

Contribution

It introduces a method to construct perfect quantum strategies with small input sets in multiple dimensions using extended Kochen-Specker sets and recursive techniques.

Findings

Constructed perfect strategies in infinitely many dimensions.

Identified Bell inequalities that are not tight.

Provided a recursive method for generating strategies in higher dimensions.

Abstract

A perfect strategy is one that allows the mutually in-communicated players of a nonlocal game to win every trial of the game. Perfect strategies are basic tools for some fundamental results in quantum computation and crucial resources for some applications in quantum information. Here, we address the problem of producing qudit-qudit perfect quantum strategies with a small number of settings. For that, we exploit a recent result showing that any perfect quantum strategy induces a Kochen-Specker set. We identify a family of KS sets in even dimension $d \ge 6$ that, for many dimensions, require the smallest number of orthogonal bases known: $d+1$. This family was only defined for some $d$. We first extend the family to infinitely many more dimensions. Then, we show the optimal way to use each of these sets to produce a bipartite perfect strategy with minimum input cardinality. As a result, we present a family of perfect quantum strategies in any $(2,d-1,d)$ Bell scenario, with $d = 2^kp^m$ for $p$ prime, $m \geq k \geq 0$ (excluding $m=k=0$), $d = 8p$ for $p \geq 19$, $d=kp$ for $p > ((k-2)2^{k-2})^2$ whenever there exists a Hadamard matrix of order $k$, other sporadic examples, as well as a recursive construction that produces perfect quantum strategies for infinitely many dimensions $d$ from any dimension $d'$ with a perfect quantum strategy. We identify their associated Bell inequalities and prove that they are not tight, which provides a second counterexample to a conjecture of 2007.