3D Variational Inference-Based Double-Difference Seismic Tomography Method and Application to the SAFOD Site, California

TL;DR

This paper introduces a 3D seismic tomography method based on variational inference that improves accuracy and uncertainty quantification over traditional techniques, demonstrated on synthetic data and real SAFOD site data.

Contribution

The study extends variational inference to 3D double-difference seismic tomography, offering more accurate models and reliable uncertainty estimates without regularization constraints.

Findings

More accurate velocity models than traditional DD tomography.

Uncertainty estimates are more reliable and precise.

Velocity uncertainties less than 0.34 km/s for Vp and 0.23 km/s for Vs.

Abstract

Seismic tomography is a crucial technique used to image subsurface structures at various scales, accomplished by solving a nonlinear and nonunique inverse problem. It is therefore important to quantify velocity model uncertainties for accurate earthquake locations and geological interpretations. Monte Carlo sampling techniques are usually used for this purpose, but those methods are computationally intensive, especially for large datasets or high-dimensional parameter spaces. In comparison, Bayesian variational inference provides a more efficient alternative by delivering probabilistic solutions through optimization. The method has been proven to be efficient in 2D tomographic problems. In this study, we apply variational inference to solve 3D double-difference (DD) seismic tomographic system using both absolute and differential travel time data. Synthetic tests demonstrate that the new method can produce more accurate velocity models than the original DD tomography method by avoiding regularization constraints, and at the same time provides more reliable uncertainty estimates. Compared to traditional checkerboard resolution tests, the resulting uncertainty estimates measure more accurately the reliability of the solution. We further apply the new method to data recorded by a local dense seismic array around the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) site along the San Andreas Fault (SAF) at Parkfield. Similar to other researches, the obtained velocity models show significant velocity contrasts across the fault. More importantly, the new method produces velocity uncertainties of less than 0.34 km/s for Vp and 0.23 km/s for Vs. We therefore conclude that variational inference provides a powerful and efficient tool for solving 3D seismic tomographic problems and quantifying model uncertainties.