The GPT Dilemma: Foundation Models and the Shadow of Dual-Use

TL;DR

This paper explores the dual-use dilemma of foundation models in AI, emphasizing risks for international security, and proposes strategies to mitigate potential military escalations through transparency and regulation.

Contribution

It introduces a framework analyzing development cycle factors to identify ambiguity points and suggests mitigation strategies based on the INF Treaty case study.

Findings

Ambiguity in civilian and military AI applications can lead to misperceptions.

Framework identifies key points of potential dual-use ambiguity.

Proposed strategies include transparency, red lines, and constraints to reduce escalation risks.

Abstract

This paper examines the dual-use challenges of foundation models and the consequent risks they pose for international security. As artificial intelligence (AI) models are increasingly tested and deployed across both civilian and military sectors, distinguishing between these uses becomes more complex, potentially leading to misunderstandings and unintended escalations among states. The broad capabilities of foundation models lower the cost of repurposing civilian models for military uses, making it difficult to discern another state's intentions behind developing and deploying these models. As military capabilities are increasingly augmented by AI, this discernment is crucial in evaluating the extent to which a state poses a military threat. Consequently, the ability to distinguish between military and civilian applications of these models is key to averting potential military escalations. The paper analyzes this issue through four critical factors in the development cycle of foundation models: model inputs, capabilities, system use cases, and system deployment. This framework helps elucidate the points at which ambiguity between civilian and military applications may arise, leading to potential misperceptions. Using the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty as a case study, this paper proposes several strategies to mitigate the associated risks. These include establishing red lines for military competition, enhancing information-sharing protocols, employing foundation models to promote international transparency, and imposing constraints on specific weapon platforms. By managing dual-use risks effectively, these strategies aim to minimize potential escalations and address the trade-offs accompanying increasingly general AI models.