Anti-Concentration for the Unitary Haar Measure and Applications to Random Quantum Circuits
Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Wei Zhan

TL;DR
This paper establishes an anti-concentration inequality for the Haar measure on unitary groups, leading to new bounds on the scrambling speed of random quantum circuits and enabling efficient algorithms for learning and analyzing such circuits.
Contribution
It introduces a novel anti-concentration inequality for the Haar measure and applies it to derive lower bounds on scrambling speed, as well as polynomial-time algorithms for learning and depth estimation of random quantum circuits.
Findings
Proves a polynomial anti-concentration inequality for Haar-random unitaries.
Shows that the influence of each input qubit in a random circuit is at least inverse exponential in depth.
Provides the first polynomial-time algorithm for learning log-depth Haar-random quantum circuits.
Abstract
We prove a Carbery-Wright style anti-concentration inequality for the unitary Haar measure, by showing that the probability of a polynomial in the entries of a random unitary falling into an range is at most a polynomial in . Using it, we show that the scrambling speed of a random quantum circuit is lower bounded: Namely, every input qubit has an influence that is at least inverse exponential in depth, on any output qubit touched by its lightcone. Our result on scrambling speed works with high probability over the choice of a circuit from an ensemble, as opposed to just working in expectation. As an application, we give the first polynomial-time algorithm for learning log-depth random quantum circuits with Haar random gates up to polynomially small diamond distance, given oracle access to the circuit. Other applications of this new scrambling speed lower…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
