Essential subgroups and essential extensions
Sourav Koner, Biswajit Mitra

TL;DR
This paper extends the concepts of essential submodules and extensions from modules to groups, providing characterizations, properties, and a new proof of a classical theorem in group theory.
Contribution
It introduces the extension of essential subgroup concepts to nonabelian groups and characterizes groups lacking proper essential extensions, also offering a new proof of a key theorem.
Findings
Characterization of groups without proper essential extensions
Conditions for a group to have a proper essential subgroup
A short proof of the theorem that only the trivial group is injective in the category of groups
Abstract
The notion of essential submodules and essential extensions of modules are extended to groups (typically nonabelian), and several necessary and sufficient conditions for a group to possess a proper essential subgroup are investigated. Further, we have completely characterized groups that do not possess a proper essential extension. These observations are used in concluding several properties of groups having essential subgroups. Finally, a short proof of the well-known theorem of Eilenberg and Moore that the only injective object in the category of groups is the trivial group is given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Finite Group Theory Research
