Partial Identification of the Average Treatment Effect with Stochastic Counterfactuals and Discordant Twins
Brian Knaeble, Braxton Osting, Placede Tshiaba

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method for partially identifying the average treatment effect using stochastic counterfactuals and discordant twin outcomes, providing bounds through constrained optimization in observational data.
Contribution
It develops a novel approach combining stochastic counterfactuals and discordant twins to improve partial identification of causal effects in observational studies.
Findings
Provides bounds for the average treatment effect
Uses discordant twin outcomes as evidence for randomness
Demonstrates applicability with three examples
Abstract
We develop a novel approach to partially identify causal estimands, such as the average treatment effect (ATE), from observational data. To better satisfy the stable unit treatment value assumption (SUTVA) we utilize stochastic counterfactuals within a propensity-prognosis model of the data generating process. For more precise identification we utilize knowledge of discordant twin outcomes as evidence for randomness in the data generating process. Our approach culminates with a constrained optimization problem; the solution gives upper and lower bounds for the ATE. We demonstrate the applicability of our introduced methodology with three example applications.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
