The comparison of an optical and X-ray counterpart of subparsec supermassive binary black holes
P. Jovanovi\'c, S. Simi\'c, V. Borka Jovanovi\'c, D. Borka, L. \v{C}., Popovi\'c

TL;DR
This study compares optical and X-ray spectral signatures of subparsec supermassive black hole binaries to identify potential observational markers for their detection and orbital characterization.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation-based comparison of optical and X-ray line profiles to detect SMBHBs and analyze their orbital phases.
Findings
SMBHBs cause distinct variability in optical and X-ray lines.
Line profile imprints depend on orbital phase.
Profiles can help reconstruct binary orbits.
Abstract
In this paper, we study and compare the optical and X-ray counterparts of subparsec supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs). With that aim, we simulated the profiles of optical spectral lines emitted from the broad line region (BLR) as well as X-ray spectral lines emitted from the relativistic accretion disks around both black holes and compared them with each other. The obtained results showed that SMBHBs could cause a specific, but different variability of the lines from the optical part and Fe K line, leaving potentially detectable imprints in their profiles. Since these imprints depend on the orbital phase of the system, they could be used for reconstructing the Keplerian orbits of the components in the observed SMBHBs. Moreover, such signatures in the optical and X-ray line profiles of the observed SMBHBs could be used as a tool for the detection of these objects as well…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
