Towards Robust Hemolysis Modeling with Uncertainty Quantification: A Universal Approach to Address Experimental Variance
Christopher Blum, Ulrich Steinseifer, Michael Neidlin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a universal approach using Markov Chain Monte Carlo to incorporate experimental uncertainty into hemolysis models, improving their robustness and predictive accuracy for medical device evaluation.
Contribution
It applies MCMC to quantify uncertainty in hemolysis model parameters, addressing non-uniqueness and variability issues in traditional deterministic models.
Findings
MCMC reveals multiple local minima in model fitting.
Distributions of parameters better match experimental data.
Enhanced model robustness over deterministic approaches.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to address the lack of uncertainty quantification in numerical hemolysis models, which are critical for medical device evaluations. Specifically, we aim to incorporate experimental variability into these models using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to enhance predictive accuracy and robustness. Methods: We applied the MCMC method to an experimental hemolysis dataset to derive detailed stochastic distributions for the hemolysis Power Law model parameters , and . These distributions were then propagated through a reduced order model of the FDA benchmark pump to quantify the experimental uncertainty in hemolysis measurements with respect to the predicted pump hemolysis. Results: The MCMC analysis revealed multiple local minima in the sum of squared errors, highlighting the non-uniqueness of traditional Power Law model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFuel Cells and Related Materials
