Casimir-Lifshitz force with graphene: theory versus experiment, role of spatial non-locality and of losses
Pablo Rodriguez-Lopez, Mauro Antezza

TL;DR
This paper investigates the influence of spatial non-locality and losses in graphene's electromagnetic response on the Casimir-Lifshitz force, finding that for current experiments, these effects are negligible and simpler models suffice.
Contribution
It demonstrates that simple local models of graphene's electromagnetic response are adequate for current Casimir-Lifshitz force experiments, and clarifies the roles of non-locality and losses.
Findings
Theoretical predictions are practically identical across different models for current experimental parameters.
Current experiments cannot distinguish between Drude and Plasma models for graphene and gold.
A simple local Kubo model effectively matches experimental results for typical configurations.
Abstract
We analyze the impact of spatial non-locality and losses in the electromagnetic response of graphene on the Casimir-Lifshitz interaction. To this purpose, we calculate the Casimir-Lifshitz force (CLF) between a gold sphere and a graphene-coated SiO plane and compare our finding with the recent experiment in PRL {\bf 126}, 206802 (2021) and PRB {\bf 104}, 085436 (2021). We calculated the CLF using three different models for the electromagnetic response of graphene: electric conductivity using a non-local and lossy Kubo model, electric conductivity using the local and lossy Kubo model, and the non-local and lossless polarization operator model. The relation between these three models has been recently explored in PRB {\bf 111}, 115428 (2025). We show that, for the parameters of the available experiments, the theoretical predictions for the Casimir-Lifshitz force using the three models…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
