Segmentation by registration-enabled SAM prompt engineering using five reference images

TL;DR

This paper introduces a registration-based prompt engineering framework for SAM that enables effective medical image segmentation using minimal reference images without requiring segmentation labels, demonstrated on knee cartilage MRI data.

Contribution

The proposed method leverages image registration to align reference images and prompts, improving SAM's segmentation performance in medical imaging without needing labeled training data.

Findings

Achieved Dice scores of 0.89 and 0.87 for femur and tibia segmentation.

Outperformed atlas-based label fusion methods.

Comparable to supervised nnUNet without requiring segmentation labels.

Abstract

The recently proposed Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a general tool for image segmentation, but it requires additional adaptation and careful fine-tuning for medical image segmentation, especially for small, irregularly-shaped, and boundary-ambiguous anatomical structures such as the knee cartilage that is of interest in this work. Repaired cartilage, after certain surgical procedures, exhibits imaging patterns unseen to pre-training, posing further challenges for using models like SAM with or without general-purpose fine-tuning. To address this, we propose a novel registration-based prompt engineering framework for medical image segmentation using SAM. This approach utilises established image registration algorithms to align the new image (to-be-segmented) and a small number of reference images, without requiring segmentation labels. The spatial transformations generated by registration align either the new image or pre-defined point-based prompts, before using them as input to SAM. This strategy, requiring as few as five reference images with defined point prompts, effectively prompts SAM for inference on new images, without needing any segmentation labels. Evaluation of MR images from patients who received cartilage stem cell therapy yielded Dice scores of 0.89, 0.87, 0.53, and 0.52 for segmenting femur, tibia, femoral- and tibial cartilages, respectively. This outperforms atlas-based label fusion and is comparable to supervised nnUNet, an upper-bound fair baseline in this application, both of which require full segmentation labels for reference samples. The codes are available at: https://github.com/chrissyinreallife/KneeSegmentWithSAM.git