Bad local minima exist in the stochastic block model
Amin Coja-Oghlan, Lena Krieg, Johannes Christian Lawnik, Olga, Scheftelowitsch

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in the disassortative stochastic block model, there are local minima in the posterior distribution that hinder MAP inference, despite the existence of efficient algorithms for community detection.
Contribution
It provides evidence of the existence of poor local minima in the posterior landscape of the stochastic block model, challenging assumptions about inference optimality.
Findings
MAP inference can fail due to local minima.
Efficient algorithms can still succeed despite MAP failure.
Posterior modes may have low agreement with ground truth.
Abstract
We study the disassortative stochastic block model with three communities, a well-studied model of graph partitioning and Bayesian inference for which detailed predictions based on the cavity method exist [Decelle et al. (2011)]. We provide strong evidence that for a part of the phase where efficient algorithms exist that approximately reconstruct the communities, inference based on maximum a posteriori (MAP) fails. In other words, we show that there exist modes of the posterior distribution that have a vanishing agreement with the ground truth. The proof is based on the analysis of a graph colouring algorithm from [Achlioptas and Moore (2003)].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications
