Productive self/vulnerable body: self-tracking, overworking culture, and conflicted data practices
Elise Li Zheng

TL;DR
This paper examines how self-tracking in China's overworking culture influences individuals' health practices, revealing conflicts between technological promises and social realities through interviews and sociotechnical analysis.
Contribution
It contextualizes self-tracking within socio-cultural factors, integrating STS theories to analyze user interactions and resistance in an overworking environment.
Findings
Self-tracking is shaped by productivity and workplace culture.
Users enact different practices to interpret and resist data.
Technological design influences users' affective experiences.
Abstract
Self-tracking, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of personal data, signifies an individualized way of health governance as people are demanded to build a responsible self by internalizing norms. However, the technological promises often bear conflicts with various social factors such as a strenuous schedule, a lack of motivation, stress, and anxieties, which fail to deliver health outcomes. To re-problematize the phenomenon, this paper situates self-tracking in an overworking culture in China and draws on semi structured and in depth interviews with overworking individuals to reveal the patterns in users interactions and interpretations with self-tracking data. It builds on the current literature of self-tracking and engages with theories from Science and Technology Studies, especially sociomaterial assemblages (Lupton 2016) and technological mediation (Verbeek 2005), to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
