How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?
Leo Yu-Ho Lo, Huamin Qu

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of multimodal Large Language Models in detecting misleading visualizations, exploring prompt strategies and scalability to improve chart analysis and counter misinformation.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic evaluation of multimodal LLMs for identifying misleading charts and proposes effective prompting strategies to enhance detection capabilities.
Findings
LLMs show strong chart comprehension and critical thinking abilities.
Prompt complexity influences detection performance.
Strategies developed improve scalability from 5 to 21 chart issues.
Abstract
In this study, we address the growing issue of misleading charts, a prevalent problem that undermines the integrity of information dissemination. Misleading charts can distort the viewer's perception of data, leading to misinterpretations and decisions based on false information. The development of effective automatic detection methods for misleading charts is an urgent field of research. The recent advancement of multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced a promising direction for addressing this challenge. We explored the capabilities of these models in analyzing complex charts and assessing the impact of different prompting strategies on the models' analyses. We utilized a dataset of misleading charts collected from the internet by prior research and crafted nine distinct prompts, ranging from simple to complex, to test the ability of four different multimodal LLMs in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
