Characterisation and assessment of the SOXS Spectrograph UV-VIS Detector System
R. Cosentino, M. Hernandez, H. Ventura, S. Campana, R. Claudi, P., Schipani, M. Aliverti, L. Asquini, A. Baruffolo, F. Battaini, Sagi Ben-Ami,, A. Bichkovsky, G. Capasso, F. D'Alessio, P. D'Avanzo, O. Hershko, H., Kuncarayakti, M. Landoni, M. Munari, G. Pignata, A. Rubin

TL;DR
This paper reports on the comprehensive testing and performance evaluation of the UV-VIS detector system of the SOXS spectrograph, confirming its readiness for deployment on the ESO NTT telescope.
Contribution
It provides detailed performance metrics and validation procedures for the UV-VIS detector system, including upgrades and simulation-based testing for telescope deployment.
Findings
System achieved desired gain, noise, and linearity specifications.
Testing confirmed readiness for deployment at ESO NTT.
Upgraded acquisition system improved performance.
Abstract
The SOXS spectrograph, designed for the ESO NTT telescope, operates in both the optical (UV-VIS: 350-850 nm) and NIR (800-2000 nm) bands. This article provides an overview of the final tests conducted on the UV-VIS camera system using a telescope simulator. It details the system's performance evaluation, including key metrics such as gain, readout noise, and linearity, and highlights the advancements made in the upgraded acquisition system. The testing process, conducted in the Padua laboratory, involved comprehensive simulations of the telescope environment to ensure the results closely resemble those expected at the ESO-NTT telescope. The successful completion of these tests confirms the system's readiness for deployment to Chile, where it will be installed on the NTT telescope, marking a significant milestone in the SOXS project.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
