Asymmetry Analysis of Bilateral Shapes
Kanti V. Mardia, Xiangyu Wu, John T. Kent, Colin R. Goodall, Balvinder S. Khambay

TL;DR
This paper develops landmark-based methods to measure and compare bilateral asymmetry in biological shapes, using size-and-shape analysis and statistical tests, demonstrated on a dataset of cleft lip surgery outcomes.
Contribution
It introduces two novel approaches for testing asymmetry differences between groups, including a feature extraction technique for identifying key landmarks.
Findings
Significant asymmetry differences found between cleft lip and normal groups.
Method successfully identifies anatomically relevant landmarks.
Approach applicable to medical shape analysis and symmetry assessment.
Abstract
Many biological objects possess bilateral symmetry about a midline or midplane, up to a ``noise'' term. This paper uses landmark-based methods to measure departures from bilateral symmetry, especially for the two-group problem where one group is more asymmetric than the other. In this paper, we formulate our work in the framework of size-and-shape analysis including registration via rigid body motion. Our starting point is a vector of elementary asymmetry features defined at the individual landmark coordinates for each object. We introduce two approaches for testing. In the first, the elementary features are combined into a scalar composite asymmetry measure for each object. Then standard univariate tests can be used to compare the two groups. In the second approach, a univariate test statistic is constructed for each elementary feature. The maximum of these statistics lead to an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
