Contrastive Learning Is Not Optimal for Quasiperiodic Time Series
Adrian Atienza, Jakob Bardram, Sadasivan Puthusserypady

TL;DR
This paper introduces DEAPS, a non-contrastive learning method for quasiperiodic time series like ECGs, which improves representation learning and classification accuracy with limited labeled data.
Contribution
The paper proposes DEAPS, a novel non-contrastive approach that captures dynamic patterns in quasiperiodic time series, outperforming contrastive methods especially with few labels.
Findings
DEAPS achieves +10% accuracy over SOTA with limited labeled data.
Avoiding negative pairs helps the model focus on temporal changes.
The Gradual Loss enhances dynamic pattern capturing.
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) for time series analysis, a noticeable gap persists between the anticipated achievements and actual performance. While these methods have demonstrated formidable generalization capabilities with minimal labels in various domains, their effectiveness in distinguishing between different classes based on a limited number of annotated records is notably lacking. Our hypothesis attributes this bottleneck to the prevalent use of Contrastive Learning, a shared training objective in previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. By mandating distinctiveness between representations for negative pairs drawn from separate records, this approach compels the model to encode unique record-based patterns but simultaneously neglects changes occurring across the entire record. To overcome this challenge, we introduce Distilled Embedding for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsContrastive Learning
