TL;DR
This paper investigates the parameter identifiability of partially observed linear causal models, providing theoretical conditions for identifiability, and proposes a likelihood-based estimation method validated on synthetic and real data.
Contribution
It extends prior work by allowing all variables to be related and considering all edge coefficients, offering new graphical conditions and a novel estimation approach.
Findings
Identifies three types of parameter indeterminacy.
Provides sufficient and necessary graphical conditions for identifiability.
Validates the method's effectiveness on synthetic and real datasets.
Abstract
Linear causal models are important tools for modeling causal dependencies and yet in practice, only a subset of the variables can be observed. In this paper, we examine the parameter identifiability of these models by investigating whether the edge coefficients can be recovered given the causal structure and partially observed data. Our setting is more general than that of prior research - we allow all variables, including both observed and latent ones, to be flexibly related, and we consider the coefficients of all edges, whereas most existing works focus only on the edges between observed variables. Theoretically, we identify three types of indeterminacy for the parameters in partially observed linear causal models. We then provide graphical conditions that are sufficient for all parameters to be identifiable and show that some of them are provably necessary. Methodologically, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsFocus
