Evaluating Cosmological Biases using Photometric Redshifts for Type Ia Supernova Cosmology with the Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program
R. Chen, D. Scolnic, M. Vincenzi, E. S. Rykoff, J. Myles, R. Kessler,, B. Popovic, M. Sako, M. Smith, P. Armstrong, D. Brout, T. M. Davis, L., Galbany, J. Lee, C. Lidman, A. M\"oller, B. O. S\'anchez, M. Sullivan, H. Qu,, P. Wiseman, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S. Allam

TL;DR
This paper assesses the use of photometric redshifts from supernova light curves in large-scale surveys to improve cosmological measurements, demonstrating that certain photo-z methods can recover key parameters with minimal bias.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates photometric redshift techniques for supernova cosmology, enabling efficient analysis without extensive spectroscopy in upcoming large surveys.
Findings
Photometric redshifts can recover the dark energy equation of state parameter w within 0.02 in simulations.
Using specific photo-z priors, biases in w are consistent with expectations within ~1σ in real data.
Photometric classification adds a subdominant systematic compared to photo-z uncertainties.
Abstract
Cosmological analyses with Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) have traditionally been reliant on spectroscopy for both classifying the type of supernova and obtaining reliable redshifts to measure the distance-redshift relation. While obtaining a host-galaxy spectroscopic redshift for most SNe is feasible for small-area transient surveys, it will be too resource intensive for upcoming large-area surveys such as the Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time, which will observe on the order of millions of SNe. Here we use data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to address this problem with photometric redshifts (photo-z) inferred directly from the SN light-curve in combination with Gaussian and full p(z) priors from host-galaxy photo-z estimates. Using the DES 5-year photometrically-classified SN sample, we consider several photo-z algorithms as host-galaxy photo-z priors, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
