Robust and consistent model evaluation criteria in high-dimensional regression
Sumito Kurata, Kei Hirose

TL;DR
This paper introduces new robust model evaluation criteria for high-dimensional linear regression that improve variable selection accuracy and robustness against outliers, outperforming traditional methods like AIC and BIC.
Contribution
It proposes divergence-based criteria with a quasi-Bayesian approach that ensure robustness and selection consistency in high-dimensional settings.
Findings
Proposed criteria outperform traditional methods in simulations.
Criteria maintain robustness against outliers.
Achieve consistent variable selection in high-dimensional models.
Abstract
Most of the regularization methods such as the LASSO have one (or more) regularization parameter(s), and to select the value of the regularization parameter is essentially equal to select a model. Thus, to obtain a model suitable for the data and phenomenon, we need to determine an adequate value of the regularization parameter. Regarding the determination of the regularization parameter in the linear regression model, we often apply the information criteria like the AIC and BIC, however, it has been pointed out that these criteria are sensitive to outliers and tend not to perform well in high-dimensional settings. Outliers generally have a negative effect on not only estimation but also model selection, consequently, it is important to employ a selection method with robustness against outliers. In addition, when the number of explanatory variables is quite large, most conventional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Methods and Inference · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
